Comorbidity among axis II diagnoses was common. Subjects met the criteria for an average of 2.4 personality disorder diagnoses (SD=1.6). The subjects with borderline personality disorder were more likely than those without borderline personality disorder to meet the criteria for histrionic (29.2% versus 5.6%; ? 2 =, df=1, p<0.0005), narcissistic (30.6% versus 15.7%; ? 2 =5.59, df=1, p=0.02), and antisocial (12.5% versus 3.7%; ? 2 =4.98, df=1, p=0.03) personality disorder. Subjects with paranoid personality disorder were more likely than those without paranoid personality disorder to meet the criteria for schizotypal (49.2% versus 20.5%; ? 2 =, df=1, p<0.0005), narcissistic (33.3% versus 15.4%; ? 2 =7.77, df=1, p=0.005), histrionic (23.5% versus 10.3%; ? 2 =5.90, df=1, p=0.02), and antisocial (12.7% versus 4.3%; ? 2 =4.34, df=1, p=0.03) personality disorder. Subjects with borderline personality disorder had a higher number of personality disorder diagnoses (other than borderline personality disorder) than subjects without borderline personality disorder (mean=2.3 diagnoses, SD=1.7, versus mean=1.8 diagnoses, SD=1.1; t=–2.35, df=178, p=0.02). Subjects with paranoid personality disorder also had a higher number of personality disorders (other than paranoid personality disorder) than subjects without paranoid personality disorder (mean=2.5 diagnoses, SD=1.7, versus mean=1.8 diagnoses, SD=1.1; t=–3.44, df=178, p=0.001).
Trauma inside the Childhood or Puberty
Dining table 2 suggests the new incidence out of exposure to upheaval during youngsters/adolescence inside the victims that have and instead of borderline identity disorder. Sufferers with borderline identity disease got significantly higher pricing out of real discipline into the youth/puberty than just victims instead borderline personality disease, that have gender managed (52.8% versus 34.3%; ? 2 =5.43, df=1, p=0.02), although teams didn’t differ in their prices out of intimate abuse (30.2% in place of 19.4%; ? dos =1.46, df=step 1, p=0.23) or off other sorts of traumatization within the youth/adolescence.
Victims which have paranoid identity problems plus had a significantly high rate from actual discipline inside youngsters/adolescence than just sufferers rather than paranoid identity disorder, with intercourse controlled (54.0% in the place of 35.0%; ? 2 =5.70, df=1, p=0.02). 4% in place of 22.2%; ? dos =0.23, df=1, p=0.63) otherwise off other kinds of shock in youthfulness/puberty. The new contacts out-of youth/teenage bodily abuse having borderline identity disease in accordance with paranoid character infection was in fact and additionally examined by using each one of the other identification ailment diagnoses while the most covariates, therefore the performance was basically mathematically equivalent.
Victims having antisocial character ailment was indeed apt to be than those versus antisocial character ailment getting already been bereaved during the young people (53.8% in place of 21.0%; ? 2 =eight.67, df=step 1, p=0.006). None of other types of identity illness is significantly and undoubtedly on the intimate punishment, real punishment, otherwise some of the other kinds of injury inside youthfulness/puberty.
Traumatization into the Adulthood
The new rates out-of connection with injury in the adulthood from inside the sufferers which have and rather than borderline identification ailment are found into the Dining table 2. Borderline identity illness wasn’t somewhat regarding the actual physical violence, intimate assault, or other sort of injury during the adulthood, with age and you will sex regulated. Sufferers that have paranoid personality disorder was in fact a great deal more most likely than those as opposed to paranoid character diseases for experienced real physical violence for the adulthood, as we age and you may intercourse controlled (33.0% in the place of 17.9%; ? dos =cuatro.84, df=1, p=0.03). People who have paranoid identity diseases along with had higher pricing out of crashes/burns off (63.5% rather than 47.0%; ? 2 =cuatro.86, df=1, p=0.03) and you will handle (9.5% in the place of step 1.7%; ? 2 =six.forty eight, df=1, p=0.01) compared to those without having any disorder, nevertheless these variations were not mathematically high following ramifications of numerous contrasting was basically managed. Not one of your other sorts of identity disorder are rather associated having almost any traumatization inside the adulthood.
Frequency of PTSD
The lives frequency out of PTSD within set of sufferers try 17.8% (N=32). The fresh rates away from PTSD in females (19.0%, N=12) and guys (17.1%, N=20) just weren’t significantly other (? 2 =0.11, df=1, p=0.74). PTSD is actually popular inside subjects that have paranoid (29%) and you may borderline (25%) personality diseases, and you can least preferred inside the victims that have narcissistic (10%) and you can passive-aggressive (12%) identification diseases. Towards leftover form of identification disorder, the brand new incidence out of PTSD varied regarding fourteen% so you’re able to 18%. Sufferers having and you may in place of PTSD didn’t disagree within their full quantity of character disorder diagnoses (mean=2.5, SD=step one.dos, in the place of mean=2.4, SD=step 1.6; t=–0.thirty six https://datingranking.net/cs/match-recenze/, df=178, p=0.72).