Comorbidity among axis II diagnoses was common. Subjects met the criteria for an average of 2.4 personality disorder diagnoses (SD=1.6). The subjects with borderline personality disorder were more likely than those without borderline personality disorder to meet the criteria for histrionic (29.2% versus 5.6%; ? 2 =, df=1, p<0.0005), narcissistic (30.6% versus 15.7%; ? 2 =5.59, df=1, p=0.02), and antisocial (12.5% versus 3.7%; ? 2 =4.98, df=1, p=0.03) personality disorder. Subjects with paranoid personality disorder were more likely than those without paranoid personality disorder to meet the criteria for schizotypal (49.2% versus 20.5%; ? 2 =, df=1, p<0.0005), narcissistic (33.3% versus 15.4%; ? 2 =7.77, df=1, p=0.005), histrionic (23.5% versus 10.3%; ? 2 =5.90, df=1, p=0.02), and antisocial (12.7% versus 4.3%; ? 2 =4.34, df=1, p=0.03) personality disorder. Subjects with borderline personality disorder had a higher number of personality disorder diagnoses (other than borderline personality disorder) than subjects without borderline personality disorder (mean=2.3 diagnoses, SD=1.7, versus mean=1.8 diagnoses, SD=1.1; t=–2.35, df=178, p=0.02). Subjects with paranoid personality disorder also had a higher number of personality disorders (other than paranoid personality disorder) than subjects without paranoid personality disorder (mean=2.5 diagnoses, SD=1.7, versus mean=1.8 diagnoses, SD=1.1; t=–3.44, df=178, p=0.001).
Trauma inside the Childhood or Puberty
Dining table 2 suggests the new incidence out of exposure to upheaval during youngsters/adolescence inside the victims that have and instead of borderline identity disorder. Sufferers with borderline identity disease got significantly higher pricing out of real discipline into the youth/puberty than just victims instead borderline personality disease, that have gender managed (52.8% versus 34.3%; ? 2 =5.43, df=1, p=0.02), although teams didn’t differ in their prices out of intimate abuse (30.2% in place of 19.4%; ? dos =1.46, df=step 1, p=0.23) or off other sorts of traumatization within the youth/adolescence.
Victims which have paranoid identity problems plus had a significantly high rate from actual discipline inside youngsters/adolescence than just sufferers rather than paranoid identity disorder, with intercourse controlled (54.0% in the place of 35.0%; ? 2 =5.70, df=1, p=0.02). 4% in place of 22.2%; ? dos =0.23, df=1, p=0.63) otherwise off other kinds of shock in youthfulness/puberty. The new contacts out-of youth/teenage bodily abuse having borderline identity disease in accordance with paranoid character infection was in fact and additionally examined by using each one of the other identification ailment diagnoses while the most covariates, therefore the performance was basically mathematically equivalent.